![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Subject: Re: Apex Submission
Oh, bullshit on your little X's.
by the way, morons, I just had it accepted elsewhere,
so up your sub-literary tanuity.
jge
This is how you piss off editors... who talk to other editors... who work on other projects.
I've just added another name to my "never work with (again)" list and I'm passing his response on to all of the other Apex submission editors.
Oh, bullshit on your little X's.
by the way, morons, I just had it accepted elsewhere,
so up your sub-literary tanuity.
jge
This is how you piss off editors... who talk to other editors... who work on other projects.
I've just added another name to my "never work with (again)" list and I'm passing his response on to all of the other Apex submission editors.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 05:01 am (UTC)Yeah, that's someone who has no interest in a long career...
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 05:18 am (UTC)Sigh. And sympathy.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 05:22 am (UTC)Learning to accept rejection has GOT to be one of the most necessary and important things to learn as a human being.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 05:01 pm (UTC)But the route they chose to deal with it was definitely the WRONG one. I'd never EVER want to piss Jennifer off :P
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 05:06 pm (UTC)I feel you. It's hard getting a nice and polite e-mail (even when it's not a form letter) saying that your lovingly crafted work, that you took so much pride in, doesn't meet whatever grade they're looking for.
But the route they chose to deal with it was definitely the WRONG one. I'd never EVER want to piss Jennifer off :P
Totally agree with you on both accounts. Regarding the first, my responses to rejection are always a quick "Thank you for reading my story and your time. I hope that in the future I'll get a chance to work further with you."
Regarding the second, I have this feeling that there would be stomping and that Jen owns several pairs of footware appropriate for the occasion.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 07:27 am (UTC)Silly goose.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 10:58 am (UTC)"Your letter has been rejected for a lack of capitalization and the use of the word 'tanuity', which I am unable to find in the dictionary. Google suggests 'tenuity', which relates to 'tenuous', which suggests some interesting connotations that nonetheless do not seem relevant to your message.
"Please rewrite and resubmit your hate-mail, and we will consider it.
"Regards, [etc.]"
*yawns* Great one to wake up to in the morning, btw.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 02:54 pm (UTC)And they never consider that fire spreads.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-16 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 02:50 am (UTC)...
...
Um.
Wow.
On the other hand, he DID get you to publish something of his. *wry*